Thursday, March 19, 2020
How to Engage First Year Law Students in Online Law School
Engaging First
Year Law Students in Online Law School
I have been teaching law almost exclusively online at CQUniversity, Australia, since 2011. Prior to that I taught
face-to-face lectures and seminars in both Australia and the UK. Earlier this year I was asked
to share with colleagues my best practices for engaging first year students in
law in the online learning space. I share some of that work here in the hope
that it may be useful for those currently transitioning to the online teaching
format.
By
way of background, the law degree at CQU is fully online. We have no face-to-face
(on campus) students, and both our staff and students are geographically
dispersed across the country (and occasionally the world). Our meeting and
teaching spaces, for the most part, exist solely within the virtual world of
Zoom videoconferencing and Moodle (our University wide Learning Management
System). Our Legal Clinic subject is also run in the virtual space as part of an
agreement with a regional Community Legal Centre.
As
a coordinator of two first year subjects in the online law degree, I have a
unique opportunity to facilitate and encourage a positive transition to law
school for our students. It is widely recognised that “first year students have
special learning needs by virtue of the social and academic transitions they
are making.”[i]
Law students in particular are documented as being susceptible to distress and
depression as they “struggle over ways of thinking, speaking and performing” in
the law school environment.[ii]
The well
documented demands and difficulties of studying by distance and online are also
inherent to the CQU law student experience. Additionally, our student cohort are
predominantly mature-age students with competing demands on their time. It is
rare to see a full time student enrolled in our program who does not already
have multiple existing work, family and/or personal commitments competing for
their attention. The benefit, however, is that students choose our degree for
its flexibility in delivery methods.
In light of current world events,
lecturers are no longer hard pressed to find lists and advice on how to
transition their curriculum online and foster engagement amongst online
learners. One might assume that online learners – particularly those who sign
up for online courses – are intrinsically motivated to study, learn and engage.
What we find, however, is often the opposite. Like our colleagues delivering face-to-face,
we continually encounter students whose learning is largely driven by
assessment and a desire for good grades.
In my experience, there is no magic formula that will
guarantee every student will become an engaged, active learner. However, one of the keys to fostering engagement, and fostering
your chances of increasing
engagement, is creating a sense of connectedness that is conducive to
development.
Making students feel welcome, heard and included
One
of my primary goals each year is to make students feel that their presence and
development in the class matters – to ensure they feel welcome, heard and
included.
Research
consistently refers to the importance of increasing social connectedness and
student engagement in improving law student well-being[iii].
As Nehme explains, “First-year law
students are learning how to study independently and may find themselves in a
foreign, intimidating environment. In an online class, such students may be out
of their element because they are expected not only to understand the relevant
concepts but to critically analyse them in a faceless and arid environment.”[iv] The
research into online learning indicates that isolation is a significant contributor
to student attrition: put simply, online learning can feel impersonal and
lonely. My experience is that a greater provision of classroom support (in both
synchronous and asynchronous forms) is required to help transition students
into the online learning environment. Both lecturer and student need to work
hard to bridge the gap created by the computer screen.
Some practical techniques I incorporate into my
subjects to help remove these barriers include:
-
Writing a brief weekly message every Monday which
is posted to the top of my Moodle site and emailed out to students. This message
introduces the topic for the week, where it fits in to the “big picture” of the
subject, along with a short dot point list of activities called “things you
might like to do this week.” Based on feedback from students, the weekly
message helps keep students engaged and up-to-date. Often, if I am late sending
it out, students will contact me asking if I will be sending a weekly message!
-
In my Tort Law subjects
I create an asynchronous social forum on the Moodle site called the “Torte Café.”
I use this forum to share memes about studying, students use it to form their
own study groups and post less formal and non-content driven conversations.
Similarly, an Icebreaker activity is set up for students at the start of term.
This is one of the simplest, yet arguably most favoured, activity by students.
Almost every student participates. The icebreaker gives students the
opportunity to offer up a contribution to the class at a time that is
convenient to them without the fear of having to demonstrate an understanding
of content. As with the Torte Café, this helps reinforce to students that our learning
space is a place of collegiality.
-
Students are encouraged to reflect on and post
about their learning styles/preferences as part of a Learning Diary reflective assignment.
This task has multiple benefits. Firstly, it allows students to become familiar
with their own learning personalities. Secondly, it allows me to identify the
needs of students and adapt my instruction and support to their needs. I work
hard to observe student behaviour, personalities and needs which in turn helps
me tailor the educational experience to each student cohort and also individual
students.
-
In a general sense, I offer positive
reinforcement when I see them working hard, celebrate their “lightbulb moments”
and offer reassurance when I see them succumbing to self-doubt. Students are encouraged to help each other out,
share their study tips and techniques, and identify any particular skills they
are bringing to the class that might not be readily apparent (e.g., IT skills,
research skills, time management skills).
I
also support students’ wellbeing through anecdotes and sharing of personal
experience (as student and practitioner) to help build their resilience
and internal motivation, and to transition away from a grade-based
determination of self-worth. I emphasise that academic grades do not determine their worth
as a person, nor do they always accurately capture their current abilities, nor
do they have to determine a student’s future abilities. In the words of
Danielle LaPorte: "absolutely everything is progress."[v].
I find this is a particularly helpful approach for those students
juggling many hats whilst at law school; for those who suffer from
perfectionism, “imposter syndrome” or what I refer to as the
“constant comparison syndrome”; and for those who simply feel overwhelmed
(particularly at the grading process).
-
I provide
personalised, recorded audio feedback to each student in response to their court
advocacy task. Audio feedback can convey tone more effectively than written
feedback and students respond positively.
-
I am also fortunate enough to have access to
student data analytics within my University. This allows me to identify
students with minimal or no engagement with the Moodle site and resources.
Within the first few weeks of term, I make a point of reaching out to those
students to see if anything is impacting their studies and offer to help. This
early intervention approach often prompts students to make important decisions
about their study load (allowing them to avoid academic or financial penalty). Students
often respond with a sense of relief that they have not been forgotten and that
they do not have to face difficulties alone.
Encourage
student confidence and transformation
Personally, I
love learning and education, and I want students to also walk away from my courses
with the enthusiasm and skills of lifelong learners. First
year law students often become very focused on rote-learning the law and
searching for the “right answer.” They do not yet understand that success in
law school is about becoming a whole package of knowledge, skills, personality
and adaptability:
Knowledge of the law --> Mastery of core skills --> Self-management
This
holistic approach to learning law is scaffolded into the activities and discussion points in my first year
subjects. In Australian legal education,
reflective practice is a core skill embedded in the Bachelor of Laws Threshold
Learning Outcomes for promoting students’ self-management skills.[vi] As part of a reflective Learning Diary assessment
written during the term, my students complete a self-confidence questionnaire
in week one, self-rating their confidence across a range of 25 skills and
competencies relevant to the online study of law. Students are also required to
set three goals for the term. At the end of Term 1, students revisit these
goals and their original confidence ratings, and reflect on any changes. At the
end of the year, students again review their goals, revisit their original confidence
ratings, and reflect on their changes. The Learning Diary brings the relevance
of skills and competencies and self-management into the process of learning law
that might otherwise be overlooked or ignored.
As Leo van Lier points out, learning something requires that one notices it in the first place: “This
noticing is an awareness of its existence, obtained and enhanced by paying
attention to it.”[vii] The Learning Diary provides a platform for
fostering students’ confidence in identifying and acknowledging things they do
well, and things that go well, in their learning. Students regularly observe increased
confidence across some or all of the skills and competencies. Importantly, the
Learning Diary helps students document their personal growth and transformation,
which has a positive effect on their learning.
Be the teacher you wanted and needed as a student
My third goal or reminder for anyone in a teaching
role is to be the teacher you wanted and needed as a student.
Almost every one of us has had a teacher who
positively influenced our life or created a class environment that really
stoked the passion for learning. Much of what I do is a direct reflection of my
most engaging and supportive teachers; I have even adopted some of their
techniques. For me, being the teacher I needed as a student means “bringing the
enthusiasm,” being authentic, personalizing my learning space, and setting
clear expectations at the outset.
Each week I try to be
enthusiastic, approachable and sincere in my capacity as teacher, which in turn
positively feeds the student response and engagement within the subject. I find that students respond positively when
they feel you are as invested in their development as they are. I also personalise my learning space with the class motto “We love Tort
Law” (imagine a school teacher decorating their classroom if you like). Every
time my students log into the class Moodle site, they are greeted with a
colourful reminder of our motto. For the record – and using a technique from
one of my most engaging university lecturers – we also chant this motto in our
Zoom sessions throughout the term. It can add some light relief to some of the
more difficult topics.
Early on in my career I was very self-conscious that
my age and gender might be perceived by students as a lack of authority. I
often over-compensated, which translated to an overly formal and stiff approach
to instruction. I was terrified of giving the wrong answer or making mistakes
and not “knowing enough.” It was after I
participated in a masterclass for distance education that I started to see the
value in owning your experiences and showing up in ways that reflect your personal
ethic. Being authentic really does makes you more personable and approachable. In
showing up authentically, I also embody the very principle I set for my students
- you don’t have to be perfect to show up.
[i] S Kift,
‘The Next, Great First Year Challenge: Sustaining, Coordinating and Embedding
Coherent Institution-Wide Approaches to Enact the FYE as ‘Everybody’s Business’
(Proceedings of the 11th International Pacific Rim First Year in Higher
Education Conference, Hobart, 30 June − 2 July 2008) 4.
[ii] C Sharp;
M Bond; T Mundy; K Murray and J Quilter, 'Taking hints From Hogwarts: UOW's
first year law immersion program' (2013) 6 (1/2) Journal of Australasian Law Teachers Association 127-139.
[iii] See,
for example, L S Krieger, ‘Human Nature as a New Guiding Philosophy for Legal
Education and the Profession’ (2007) 47 Washburn
Law Journal 247; and above n ii.
[iv]
M Nehme, ‘E-Learning and Students’ Motivation’ [2010] Legal Education Review 11 (http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/LegEdRev/2010/11.html)
[vi] Rachel Field and James Duffy, ‘Better to Light a
Single Candle Than to Curse the Darkness: Promoting Law Student Well-Being
Through a First Year Law Subject’ (2012) 12 Queensland
University of Technology Law and Justice Journal 133, 145-6.
[vii] L van Lier, (1996) Interaction
in the language curriculum. Awareness, autonomy and authenticity. Longman,
London, 11.
Guest blog author Anna Farmer joined the CQUniversity School of Business
and Law in 2010 as a Lecturer in Law.
She is the First Year Coordinator for the fully online LLB programs and
teaches Torts. She was admitted as a Solicitor of the Supreme Court of
Queensland in 2004 and is the Vice President of the Central Queensland
Community Legal Centre in Rockhampton.
Her current research interests include the transitional and transformational
learning of first year law students; online teaching technologies and clinical
experience. Anna has received multiple commendations in the CQU Student Voice
Awards for Educator of the Year and Distance Educator of the Year. In 2017 she received a Vice-Chancellor’s
Award for Exemplary Practice in Learning and Teaching.
Sunday, March 15, 2020
Scholastic is offering free online courses so your kids can keep learning while schools are closed
by Alicia Lee, CNN:
As schools across the nation close because of the coronavirus pandemic, millions of students are stuck at home with their classes on hold. But before your child gets too excited about not having to study, rest assured, parents, Scholastic has got your back.
The educational company has launched a "Learn at Home" website that has daily courses for students from Pre-kindergarten to grades 6 and higher.
From learning about why zebras have stripes to math lessons based on K-Pop stars, Scholastic's learning plans cover all the subjects your student would be taking at school.
"
As more and more teachers, students, and families around the world are affected by the coronavirus, our priority is to support them in the best way we know how -- by providing them with rich stories and meaningful projects that will keep kids academically active," Lauren Tarshis, senior vice president and editor-in-chief of Scholastic Classroom Magazines said.
The website, which is divided into four sections based on grade level, currently has five days' worth of content. An additional 15 days of content is on the way, Scholastic said in a news release.
The courses provide approximately three hours of learning per day, including writing and research projects, virtual field trips, and geography challenges.
The website is accessible on any device that has internet and no sign up is required. It will remain free and open indefinitely, Scholastic said.
© 2020 Cable News Network, Inc. A WarnerMedia Company. All Rights Reserved.
Monday, March 9, 2020
Coronavirus May Increase Exposure to Online Learning
My daughter’s fiancé is a middle school teacher at a private
school in New Jersey. He was telling me recently
about the school’s plans for dealing with a coronavirus outbreak: online learning. Come to find out, online learning is the
go-to contingency plan in multiple contexts.
In California, K-12 schools and colleges are “repurposing”
their existing
online teaching programs to accommodate F2F students who may choose or be
forced to stay home. Some schools,
especially at the college level, are anticipating increased enrollment in
online classes. Others, especially K-12,
are considering allowing students to do independent study at a distance, with
online teacher support. New Jersey
Department of Education has determined that, in case of corona-related
closures, online
learning will count toward minimum hours of classroom instruction.
In states where their governors declared a state of
emergency, universities in the state have shut down classes until at least
April. The University
of Washington will hold remaining classes and final exams for the spring
semester remotely. Stanford
University is also closed to F2F classes, and will finish out the winter
quarter remotely.
Chinese campuses of US universities are not holding classes
since the Lunar New Year, and have moved
their classes online. NYU Shanghai
moved around 300 classes online. The
university I am affiliated with (University of Utah) has moved all classes at
its Asian campus in South Korea
(except lab classes) to online status until April 6, and will reconsider next
steps after that date.
Emergency responders are being trained about the coronavirus
through online
courses by the World Health Organization and others.
Educational and other institutions are using online town
halls and other virtual communication methods to keep
their constituencies informed about the situation, without risking any germ
transmission through F2F contact.
This is all a good thing.
Don’t get me wrong – the corona virus is NOT a good thing. But it IS good that curricula and
techniques to facilitate online learning are readily available, as is fast
internet access in many locations. For
instructors who are not familiar with providing their subject matter online,
this will be a quick introduction to the possibilities and may help them
overcome any hesitation they originally had to incorporate online technology
into their regular curricula. And,
perhaps more importantly, because the availability and nature of online
learning is driven by demand, more students will find out about online learning
and perhaps look to incorporate it into their future studies.
Dear readers, stay healthy by washing your hands often and
not touching your face. The Singapore
Health Minister shares the simple steps each of us can take to protect ourselves
and others from coronavirus in this
video.
Additional Resources:
Saturday, February 29, 2020
School, the way we know it, is passé.
Or could be! Maybe should be!
For centuries teaching was done by teachers in classrooms (from one-room school houses to multi-layered brick-and-mortar lecturing facilities), facing their students, teaching by telling their audience, writing on blackboards, asking questions and making sure they understood, comprehended, and hopefully retained the knowledge presented. To a large extent today, that’s still pretty much the way general education works.
No advantage has been taken of technology which has come a long way to facilitate the learning process, even improve it, speed it up, and make it more accessible geographically. Actually, there are educators stuck in their antique mode of operation who detest the idea of using technology in the learning process. They are of the opinion that a live teacher in a classroom of live learners is the only way that knowledge can be transmitted.
That’s like saying, at the time of Gutenberg, that the introduction of the printed word in books is the work of the devil, and only in-person classroom teaching can truly transmit knowledge, an argument which was made then.
Of course we know that transmitting knowledge via books did catch on, and has been used as technological help teaching in countless ways.
A few hundred years later, now, no doubt the time has come to utilize electronic media in teaching and learning. For instance, here is what it could do today, right now, but isn’t done: In Japan schools have suddenly been closed, at least temporarily, because of the coronavirus. What if schooling there were done electronically? It would be a far safer and better way of teaching and learning than the old-fashioned way of sitting in classrooms.
Here, for your examination, is one example of learning with electronic help which does exist and is making inroads into otherwise conventional education: Supporting digital inclusion
Verizon Innovative Learning is giving middle school students the opportunity to explore emerging tech in the classroom, from augmented and virtual reality to 3D design and robotics. See
https://www.verizon.com/about/responsibility/verizon-innovative-learning
Thursday, February 20, 2020
Reflections from Both Sides of Online Learning (Student and Professor)
For some, graduate school flows
naturally from their undergraduate experience.
I’ve completed the “pre-med” slate of courses, so I will go straight to
medical school. I’m sure I want to
practice law, so I’ll head for law school.
For others, myself included, the path is less obvious. Having attended private school my entire
life, I convinced myself I needed schooling from the “real world” beyond the
peaceable kingdoms of my formal education before picking an area for deeper
study.
That decision proved to be
correct. I took a journalism job with
NPR and learned about inequity in schools and neighborhoods, the ins and outs
of land use and zoning, tradeoffs in transportation, and the impact of the rise
and fall of bedrock industries. I also
encountered one particular story out of the ordinary: the re-emergence of
conversations about a shooting involving the Ku Klux Klan and anti-Klan labor
organizers on the streets of Greensboro, North Carolina in 1979. I had never heard of the incident before
living in the Greensboro area, and no wonder—it occupied the front page of
newspapers for one day, followed immediately thereafter by the Iran hostage
crisis. More importantly, the five
shooting deaths captured by television cameras embarrassed Greensboro, many of
whose residents dismissed it as the work of outsiders using their community as
a battlefield.
But it was more than the historical
aspect of the shooting and its aftermath that interested me; it was the
decision of a local grassroots committee to create America’s first “truth and
reconciliation commission (TRC).” Patterned
after similar commissions in South Africa and elsewhere, Greensboro’s TRC
engaged seven volunteers (rather than judges or jurors) to hear voluntarily provided
testimony in private and public and deliver a report documenting their findings
and recommendations. I covered the story
for NPR and focused less on the shooting and more on the divided opinion over
the notion of a truth and reconciliation commission. Why dredge this up again? argued some,
including the then-Mayor. We can’t
afford not to, argued others.
The eventual formation of the
Greensboro TRC and the completion of its work over the next two years remained
a fascination for me. Eventually, after
a job change, I realized I had a broader fascination with resolving conflict,
and that led me to explore graduate schooling in that field—one I hadn’t known
existed when I graduated from college. I
later discovered that while the number of conflict resolution degree programs today
is substantial, there were fewer such programs ten years ago. I also was newly married and settled into a
home, with hopes (later realized) of starting a family, so the notion of relocating
to a new city for study felt impractical and unwise.
Those considerations drew me to Nova Southeastern University’s online
master’s (and eventually PhD) in conflict analysis and resolution.
As it turned out, NSU was a pioneer in distance learning and had one of
the first degree programs in conflict resolution. Its main campus also happened to be around the
corner from my in-laws’ home. But the
notion that I could participate in classes from anywhere and, in some cases, at
any time of the week or semester was very appealing. I also met and befriended students from all
corners of the world—from Saudi Arabia to Sudan—who may never have been able to
enroll in a program that required a visa.
Our twice yearly “residential institutes” gave us unique opportunities
to interact and practice our skills in person, and I was fortunate to receive
some tuition reimbursement and paid time off (without sacrificing vacation
days) to attend.
All of that said, online education as
I experienced it as a student came with challenges and limitations. Some professors chose to have no “live”
sessions or provide any significant course content beyond the assignment of
readings, online discussion board posts, and a final paper. Other professors would post written lectures
but not interact with students except for a short session at the residential
institute. Still others used their
“live” sessions online to review the contents of our assigned reading or to
deliver a lecture with limited or no student interaction. Some of this may have had to do with the
particular online platform we were using and its limitations, or it could have
related to the difficulty of creating a more interactive class session in the
face of all the other responsibilities facing a full-time professor with other,
face-to-face classes to prepare for and teach.
As someone who has designed an online
graduate school course and delivered or hosted numerous webinars, I now believe
that online education holds tremendous promise and power, along with challenges
that educators and students must work to overcome. I believe that just as in
face-to-face educational opportunities, interaction in an online setting is
key—whether through poll questions, a chat window, or the solicitation of
comments from students who can be seen and heard (or a combination of
these). I also believe that most
learners in any setting benefit greatly from small group discussion. Despite the potential for an online classroom
to accommodate even larger crowds than a physical lecture hall, it is critical
to make use of online “breakout rooms” to allow for deeper and more meaningful
interaction than is ever possible in a bigger group.
It is worth considering the blend of
live and asynchronous content as well.
Most professors who lecture, which in my view remains a valuable
teaching tool, do so without interruption for questions or discussion. This content could easily be recorded and
viewed whenever convenient for the student, with perhaps a quiz included to
check comprehension. That said, students
learn from each other differently than they learn from a professor; in fact,
the best professor helps stimulate and facilitate that form of peer-to-peer
learning. As such, any live/real-time
gathering of students online should include opportunities for them to learn
from one another.
I also think that the traditional
notion of “office hours” common on college campuses should endure online—perhaps
in the form of an online “room” that one can enter (log in) at a designated
weekly time to meet with the professor, perhaps in the company of
classmates. This form of informal
learning can be deeply valuable, even in ways not possible in the formal class
session, and online technology should accommodate it.
I also want to make mention of the
technical aspects of the online education experience. While many of us, including you reading this
blog, have easy access to the Internet, many around the world do not. Some may also only have access to the
Internet via a mobile phone or a public space like an Internet café or public
library. This demands of those of us in
online education to consider how a web-based application might work on a mobile
(whether there is a mobile app, for example, or at least a mobile friendly
website). But we also have to consider
the possibility that someone may only be able to login briefly each day or each
week, so our content should be easy to print or download for review at another
time. Furthermore, we have to consider
that some of those students whom we want to reach simply cannot access the
Internet. Most of them, however, will
have access to text messaging or telephone calls, and they can interact with
their classmates and professors via group texts, conference calls, and perhaps
materials sent by mail. As archaic as
this may sound to some, it remains an important consideration if this form of
education is to live up to its promise of broadening access to education.
We must also consider the amount of
time often wasted (in my view) on technical difficulties encountered by
teachers/presenters and students alike in an online setting. While I have encountered these myself and
occasionally technical difficulties cannot be avoided or predicted, they nearly
always can, and it is incumbent upon anyone hosting such a session to make time
for students and presenters to test their technology. We also must ensure that the technology
required to participate is either limited to that which comes with most
computers or mobile phones, or is made widely available to the students whom we
want to reach.
I am pleased to have taken advantage
of the opportunity to study in an online program with a face-to-face component
and to have the opportunity to teach online.
All of us who have either learned, taught, or experienced online
learning can easily see its potential to help more of us learn. We must only ensure that access to the
education we provide online remains widespread, and that we maintain a
commitment to student-to-teacher and student-to-student interaction.
About Blog Author Dr. Larry Schooler:
After
an award-winning career as a journalist across the globe, Larry Schooler became
a mediator, facilitator, public engagement consultant, and educator. He works
with agencies around the world to resolve disputes, build consensus, and
involve the public and stakeholders in decisions that will affect them. He also
specializes in land use mediation, strategic planning, and visioning. Dr.
Schooler holds a bachelor’s degree in history from Yale and a doctoral degree
in conflict resolution from Nova Southeastern University. He is the
author of a manual entitled “Keys to an Effective Public Meeting” and a
forthcoming book on truth and reconciliation commissions. Larry is
married to award-winning businesswoman Jolie Schooler and father to Sammy &
Robby.
Monday, February 10, 2020
How can online teaching simulate the interactivity of a classroom?
This is probably my number one question about online
education: How does the instructor
engage learners to simulate the interpersonal dynamics and learning of a
physical classroom? And especially for
skills-based classes (like the negotiation classes I used to teach), how can we
replicate the one-on-one interaction in a virtual learning environment?
There is a Chinese proverb that epitomizes my personal
approach to teaching and learning:
I hear, I forget.
I see, I remember.
I do, I understand.
In my classroom, I generally reversed the order of the
proverb’s process. I had students read
about the new concepts first. Then I
lectured about the key components I wanted them to remember. Then the students engaged in group discussion
or exercises to have the concepts become real or to put them into
practice. This approach generally
corresponds to current
thinking about adult learning:
adults learn by doing.
I’ll be coming back to some of these techniques in more
detail in future blogs, but for now, here are some of the main techniques my
research into the question has turned up.
Students interact with each other a-synchronously
·
Threaded discussion (have students comment on
each other’s posts).
·
Peer review of other students’ written
materials.
·
Invite students to contribute course content
(e.g., via online group study sessions, doing their own research and presenting
results to full class)
·
Create an exercise or game that students perform
with each other, taking turns virtually.
·
Teamwork assignments (encourage/require students
to solve problems together, often via group chats online).
·
Chatroom (video and/or text only) with
instructor or fellow students.
·
Group discussions in online forums.
·
Study-unit blogs.
Students practice skills directly with each other
·
Role-playing simulations (combining synchronous
and a-synchronous communication using email, chat rooms).
·
Using Zoom, Skype or similar web-based personal
communication technologies, students set up an appointment to conduct exercises
(e.g., a negotiation simulation) with each other.
·
Chatroom with instructor or fellow students.
I’d love to hear some of your experiences with making the
online learning experience more interactive, especially techniques for
recreating the feel of face-to-face (F2F).
Email me.
Resources:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)